What are the most recent developments regarding immigration?
Immigration reform has become a priority of the second Obama Administration and indications are that there is finally bipartisan support for reform. The Administration is proposing legalization process for undocumented immigrants involving 8 year path to obtaining green cards after paying back taxes, learning English, and completing American civics classes. Legalized undocumented immigrants would have a longer timeline to achieve citizenship. The proposal is accompanied by a pledge for stronger border and workplace enforcement. In addition there would be improvements in the immigration court system. The most significant Republican counterproposal has been to link the legalization process with improvements in border security.
Surprisingly, nativist opposition to the massive illegal immigration which has occurred during the past two decades has not been signficant despite years of economic recession beginning in 2008. The issue was not prominent in the 2012 Presidential election. On the other side of the controversy there has been ongoing pressure from representatives of the Hispanic community to legitimize the millions of American residents who must live their lives in constant fear of governmental discovery or harrasment. In 2007 Arizona made it a misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona
without carrying registration documents required by federal law and and cracked down on
those sheltering, hiring and transporting illegal aliens. In other states there has been harassment at the local level where police checkpoints are used to identify illegal immigrants and forward the information to federal authorities.
Public opinion has now significantly shifted in favor of the Administration's proposal to establish a legalization process but the public also strongly supports linking this reform to establishing stronger border control.
How do people legally immigrate into the United States?
Over a million people legally immigrated into the U.S. in 2009 under qualifying categories: The categories are:
- Employment-based preference is a category that permits a limited number of individuals who possess job skills which are in demand by the
economy. In 2002, this group was dominated by persons with computer and engineering skills.
- Family preference is a category that permits individuals to sponsor a limited number of relatives (adult children of U.S. citizens, spouses
and children of immigrants, and siblings of citizens).
- Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizens is a category that permits citizens to sponsor an unlimited number of minor children, spouses, and
parents. This has been the largest category.
- Diversity is a category authorized by recent legislation which authorizes a limited number of individuals to immigrate based on past
under-representation in the immigrant population.
- Refugees/Asylees are admitted on a limited basis based on political and humanitarian reasons. The maximum numbers vary year-to-year based
on Presidential determinations.
What is the difference between legal immigrants and citizens?
Legal immigrants are basically entitled to the same rights as citizens although they cannot vote or hold political office. About 40% of immigrants
become citizens through a process called naturalization. In order to become naturalized, immigrants must reside in the U.S. for five years. Most must demonstrate a proficiency in English
and a knowledge of U.S. history and government. The primary motive for immigrants to become citizens is that they qualify to assist their relatives
Why is the United States experiencing a new "wave" of new immigration?
The United States has recently experienced a rate of immigration that in numbers is close to the level of immigration that occurred at the turn of the
last century. (Click to see chart) The combined legal and illegal immigration is well over one million per year. Foreign-born persons now constitute over 10% of the
population for the first time since the 1930s. . In
California and New York over 20% of the population is foreign born and the ratio is over 10% in many other states. (Click to see map) There have been several reasons for this
continuing increase over the past three decades:
- Refugee immigration peaked in the late '70s and '80s as the U.S. admitted a large number of Southeast Asian, Cuban and Russian immigrants. Many
individuals in these categories have become citizens which has enabled them to sponsor admission for their parents without any numeric limitation.
- Two amnesty programs provided legal status to nearly 3 million undocumented immigrants and their families in the late '80s and early '90s. The
immigrants legalized under these programs account for almost a quarter of all legal immigration from 1981 to 1995.
- A large number of illegal immigrants have entered the country over the last two decades although the trend is changing. The immigrants have primarily come from Mexico and other parts of Latin America. Despite the downturn in new entrants, the increase in the total illegal immigrant population has been
dramatic. A report issued in 2005 based
on census data estimates that undocumented immigrants constitute almost 30% of all foreign born residents. The Department of Labor determined that in 2001 undocumented immigrants constituted over one half of all
What countries do immigrants come from and what states do they go to?
Legal immigrants to the U.S. primarily come from Latin America and Asia. The overwheliming majority of illegal immigrants come from Mexico and Central America. Prior to 1970, most immigrants came from Europe.
In the early 20th century, Asians were specifically excluded by
legislation. Moreover, a "quota" system, in effect during much of the 20th century limited immigration and gave preferential treatment to
Legal immigrants tend to choose the large population states as their state of preference. California, New York, Texas and Florida contain the largest percentages of unauthorized
immigrants but, in contrast to 1990, this immigration has now
spread throughout the country.
How is immigration affecting the country?
Immigration is the main reason for U.S. population growth. Based on the current rate of immigration, U.S. population will increase substantially
increase by 2050 and 65% of this growth will be either the direct or indirect effect of immigration. Immigration will significantly affect the ethnic make-up of the population.
Whether these trends are positives or negatives is the subject of a national debate. The debate centers around these themes:
Advantages of immigration:
- Greater supply of unskilled workers Studies have indicated that because most immigrants occupy low-paying, low-skill jobs, their
presence is complementary. Because of their contributions, the overall economy is stronger and the wage level and standard of living of most native workers
is higher than would exist if they were not present. In particular, the high concentration of undocumented workers in the agricultural industry keep food
prices relatively low.
- A younger workforce The ratio of retired persons to workers will dramatically increase in coming decades which will require
significant adjustments in the Social Security system. (See Social Security) Immigrants and their children tend to be younger than natives. As a result, continued or greater immigration will slow the increase
of this important ratio.
- Skilled workers in needed sectorsImmigrants who arrive under the "employment preference" category often are employed in occupations which are
important. For example, 20% of U.S. doctors are foreign born. But critics of immigration policy note that this is because the supply of native doctors is
kept artificially low and that these doctors are probably even more essential to their native countries.
Disadvantages of immigration:
Why didn't increased border surveillance slow illegal immigration?
Even though there was a significant increase in spending on border security in the past decade, , the major effect of the increased surveillance has been to shift the entry locations to areas where the terrain is difficult to effectively control and to substantially increase the amount charged by professional smugglers who assist the immigrants. The emphasis on border enforcement was not accompanied by a significant increase in worksite enforcement. Indeed efforts at effective worksite enforcement have often been frustrated by industries who substantially rely on the low wage labor of the immigrant workers. Because of severe climate conditions at some of the frequent crossing
areas, there is a significant mortality rate and the shift has also had the effect of keeping immigrants from returning to Mexico because of the difficulty in returning to the U.S. again.
Studies have suggested that the volume of illegal immigrants has been directly related to economic conditions in Mexico. Mexico has long had more people of
working age than jobs and unemployment there is about 20%. As Mexico's economy continues to grow and its birth rate slows, it is likely that illegal
immigration will decline significantly even if additional enforcement measures are not taken and in fact that trend has already begun.
What efforts have been made to address the illegal immigrant situation?
The political situation has been complicated by popular nativist sentiment on one side, liberal and Hispanic agitation for legalization on the other, and strong business interests which seem satisfied with the status quo. The result has been little movement on the issue in one direction or the other.
In May 2006, the Senate passed reform measure which provided for stricter border control but also allowed
for a legalization process for many illegal immigrants presently in the country. This measure appeared to have the Bush Administration's support, but the House deliberately delayed any action. In March 2007, the Bush Administration announced a major change in policy; advocating a very costly visa and legalization process, some of which was added to the compromise legislation. Immigrants and their supporters opposed this
change which appeared to be an effort to mollify nativist sentiments.
In June 2007, the Senate rejected bi-partisan compromise legislation which had been introduced in attempt to resolve the immigration
controversy. The measure proposed to allow illegal immigrants to obtain a renewable visa if they were present on January 1, 2007. Additional visas would
have been awarded to temporary workers. A worker verification system and increased border security system had to be in place before the visa programs go
into effect. A special, less burdensome path to legal status was provided for undocumented agricultural workers and high school graduates who came to the
U.S. illegally with their parents. With the onset of the recession in 2008, momentum for immigration reform ended and has only been revived in 2012.
Without signficant federal action, the situation has been addressed at the state and local levels most notably in Arizona. Legislation in that state make it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying registration documents required by federal law, steps up state and local law enforcement of Federal immigration laws, and cracks down on those sheltering, hiring and transporting illegal aliens. Critics of the legislation say it encourages racial profiling, while supporters say the law simply enforces existing federal law. There have been protests in opposition to the law in over 70 U.S. cities, including calls for a boycott of Arizona. Polling has found the law to have majority support in Arizona and nationwide. In other states there has been harassment at the local level where police checkpoints are used to identify illegal immigrants and forward the information to federal authorities.
How do immigration policies differ in other countries?
Although U.S. immigration is substantial, other countries have adopted policies which encourage even greater immigration. Canada has long encouraged immigration as a vehicle for economic
growth and its policies place greater emphasis on economic needs as a basis for recruitment of new immigrants. This is also true of Australia. Some
European countries, notably Germany, have begun to encourage immigration in recognition of a growing labor shortage which will continue as the native
population ages. Countries in Europe which had traditionally been emigrant countries, such as Ireland, Italy and Spain, are now beginning to experience net
immigration for the first time. Some European countries and Canada have guest worker programs which allow workers to temporarily immigrate and then return
to the country of origin.
What are current proposals to modify immigration policies?
There is some public sentiment for limiting future immigration by reducing the numerical limits for permitted entrants but this view does not
presently have major support in the Congress or with the Administration. The key issues are being considered are:
- Amnesty and guest worker programs
In January 2004, the Bush Administration proposed a solution to the undocumented problem in the form of a new guest worker program. In order to qualify
under this plan, the workers must have a job offer and the employer must show no Americans wanted the job. Under the plan, undocumented workers who gained
temporary-worker status would enjoy the rights and protections of legal workers. They could also apply for green cards, which convey permanent residency and,
potentially, citizenship. The workers must return to their home countries at the end of the term. Dependents of the temporary workers would be allowed in
the US if the workers could prove they could support their family. The workers would be allowed to move freely back and forth between the US and their home
country. The proposal has rekindled the immigration debate by pitting employers and many Hispanics who support the proposal against some elements of
organized labor and many conservative "America First" citizens who oppose it. The proposal does not have broad public support.
The Bush proposal has not been acted upon by Congress. The Republican platform advocates the approval of this plan and rejects any consideration of
amnesty. The Democratic platform indicates an opposition to the "second class" status proposed by the Bush plan but does not propose a legalized
alternative. Instead it advocates improving the level of government services to undocumented workers and their families and focusing border control efforts
on terrorist threats.
In the meantime, the overall number of legal immigrants continues to grow substantially contributing to an ever growing portion of the U.S. resident
population that is foreign born. There is little mainstream political opposition to the rate of legal immigration.
Where do Democrats and Republicans stand on immigration issues?
In general, Democrats vote to encourage immigration and Republicans are for greater enforcement at the border areas. But immigration is not a strictly partisan issue. Many business interests supported by Republicans rely on immigrant labor and and many labor interests supported by Democrats often take a protectionist position on immigration issues. Certain key votes during the last decade demonstrate this uneven pattern.
Wikipedia-Illegal Immigration to the United States
Office of Immigration Statistics
National Research Council Report
CRS Report - Immigration Issues in 112th Congress
Census Bureau Info
Immigration and Immigrants: Setting the Record Straight (Urban Institute)
Center for Immigration Studies
FAIR - General issue page
International Centre for Migration Policy Development